Privacy is for Government not for the People

It appears to now be the conventional wisdom in the political class and in the criminal justice system, than privacy exists solely to protect the interests of the government.  From Tech Dirt:
You may recall that in its quixotic attempt to go after Wikileaks, the US government has been snooping through the private communications of a bunch of folks they're trying to connect to the organization, including Icelandic politician Birgitta Jonsdottir and Jacob Appelbaum, who gets detained and harassed every time he re-enters the country. All of this came to light only because Twitter actually stood up to the US government and refused to just hand over info that was requested using the obscure 2703(d) process. Twitter also got the court to allow it to reveal the existence of the order (something that every other company which has received one has kept secret). A court eventually ruled that Twitter had to hand over the requested info.

Following this, Jonsdottir, Appelbaum and one other person, Rop Gonggrijp, (represented by the ACLU and the EFF), chose not to challenge that ruling, but did appeal concerning the secrecy around the order -- asking the court to have the specific 2703(d) order unsealed -- arguing that they have the right to access judicial documents about themselves. However, last week, an appeals court rejected that appeal, and basically said that the feds can sniff through your digital data without your knowledge, and, well, too bad if you don't like it.

1 comment:

  1. واحدة من أسهل الطرق التي يمكن أن أن تستخدم ، وتحتوي على أحدث المواد الكيميائية التي تعمل ضد جميع أنواع الحشرات ، وأنها آمنة تماما للأطفال وليس هناك ضرر في استخدامها.
    شركة رش مبيدات بجدة
    شركة مكافحة الفئران بجدة
    شركة مكافحة النمل الابيض بجدة
    شركة مكافحة حشرات بجدة

    ReplyDelete